X minute read
Paul Dobraszczyk imagines a dystopian future for the city in which its inhabitants' survival depends on salvaging the wastes of an economic system long gone.
Credit: Jonathan Gales / Factory Fifteen
The higher up you were able to live the more pleasant your existence would be. Afternoon breezes tempered the oppressive humidity of the omnipresent tropical heat, even if, at night, sleeping was no easier.”
To coincide with our Bartlett 100 exhibition, The Next 100 Years, we’re running a series of seven pieces by researchers at The Bartlett that offer speculative responses to the statement: ‘The built environment in 2119’. Writers have been invited to interpret it in whichever way they like, with the aim being to explore questions at the heart of how we shape the world we live in over the next century.
By Paul Dobraszczyk, Teaching Fellow at The Bartlett School of Architecture and author of ‘Future Cities: Architecture and the Imagination’ (2019)
In 2080, after the fifth financial crisis in as many decades and a government bankrupted by the first four, the banks gave up their skyscrapers in the City of London. The richest fled to their well-appointed bunkers in Tasmania and New Zealand. Others with means took up a fully nomadic life in the hundreds of sky villages that were effectively huge agglomerations of hydrogen-powered airships, moving around the globe depending on where the next pocket of atmospheric calm happened to be.
The skyscrapers that were abruptly abandoned were mostly unfinished structures, the frenzied rate of construction only ever accelerating after each successive crash. But these monolithic buildings didn’t stay empty for long. Enterprising migrants that had already built vast shantytowns on central London’s acres of parkland saw an opportunity to better themselves and moved into the most promising of these structures. Gathering waste materials from a vast array of sites across the city, the migrants gradually filled in the gaps between the concrete pillars with bits of plastic, canvas, broken breeze-blocks and irregularly-shaped bricks. Leftover scaffolding provided a handy material for adding balconies and walkways to the external walls, creating places to collect rainwater as well as to grow food. The higher up you were able to live, the more pleasant your existence would be: afternoon breezes tempered the oppressive humidity of the omnipresent tropical heat, even if, at night, sleeping was no easier.
Credit: Robert Graves and Didier Madoc-Jones, aerial photograph by Jason Hawkes
Over several decades in the swampy lowlands of Bow, an experimental community emerged.”
Meanwhile, as the shantytowns emptied of migrants, native Londoners moved in from the suburbs, eager to learn the skills now necessary for survival and which they had long taken for granted in their Victorian semis and terraces. The old infrastructural networks that held their suburban houses together no longer functioned – the hidden sewers, water and gas pipes, and electricity cables now a barrier to a new kind of existence off the grid. At least some of these once well-heeled Londoners were able to appreciate the irony of living in self-made shacks in the grounds of Buckingham Palace; long abandoned, its bloated spaces of no use to anyone now.
Over time, when it became clear that nobody was ever going to return to claim these buildings, half-finished or otherwise, the adaptations became ever more daring and outlandish and they spread to other, more unlikely structures. Like London Bridge in the medieval period, some of the city’s river crossings became inhabited again; favoured bridges being those with towers of iron and steel. Stripped bare of its stone cladding, the superstructure of Tower Bridge now supported within its metal mesh a fantastic bricolage of salvaged materials, held together by a mixture of rope, wire, nails and screws. As the Thames swelled and eventually cascaded over its Victorian embankments, most of the bridges held fast and became vital places to access the only viable source of drinking water in the city, cleansed as it was twice daily by the surging tides. Now, Tower Bridge was connected to the waters beneath it via a tangle of pulleys, buckets and rope ladders, the floating platforms beneath supporting a vast array of tiny vessels that ploughed the Thames for vital sources of protein.
On the other side of the city, in the permanently flooded regions of the East End, a vast intertidal region gave birth to an altogether new kind of shanty town, one that had literally grown out of the flood waters themselves, but which was also a result of some degree of foresight and expertise. Many architects had since left London – retreating to their country villas in the far north – but some who had seen the storm coming and embraced it in advance had already worked out how to take advantage of the urban landscape that would likely emerge in the future. Developing a new kind of living infrastructure, these architects found a way to combine waste materials and tropical vegetation to form hybrid structures. Over several decades in the swampy lowlands of Bow, an experimental community emerged.
Credit: CRAB Studio
At first, giant rafts of specially-engineered seaweed were grown as basic platforms for inhabitation. Alongside these, submerged electrodes allowed the carbonates in the water to slowly accrete which, over time, both expanded the rafts and, with manipulation, also grew into basic dwellings. Salvaged materials – mostly plastic and metal panels and timber and metal struts – were brought onto the rafts and assembled into makeshift towers. The rafts had allowed for the cultivation of a huge array of fast-growing tropical plants and, as the towers went up, so did the vegetation, the climbing plants securing the materials tightly in their webs of tendrils and leaves. These green walls eventually allowed for bridges to be constructed – or rather, grown – between the towers. By 2119, a veritable forest of verdant skyscrapers had seemingly sprouted spontaneously from the flood waters of east London.
Of course, these salvage communities – whether the former middle-classes in the old shanties in the parks, the adhoc-ist migrants in the skyscrapers, or the professionals and technicians in the sophisticated vegetated towers – knew that their continued existence depended on the wastes of an economic system now long gone. But in a vast city like London, those wastes would likely not run out anytime soon, particularly as the majority of citizens had fled to find an easier life somewhere else.
After a time, these emerging communities began to mix more freely. Skilled in an entirely new way, they were eventually able to create a new city out of the ruins of the old. Nobody in this transformed world assumed any measure of control, let alone tried to form a coherent government. Continuous challenges forced them to organise on the hoof – nothing else worked when so much around them was wreckage. To achieve any kind of order in this city was itself a form of heroism, the burden of which was taken up time and again at the dawning of each new day.
The School of Architecture is internationally renowned for innovative research and teaching that is academically rigorous, critically informed, design-led and interdisciplinary. It is part of The Bartlett, UCL's Faculty of the Built Environment. Find out more: https://ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/architecture
Urban Laboratory is a collaborative cross-disciplinary platform to promote critical and creative urban research, teaching, practice and participation. It is supported by four faculties at UCL: The Bartlett, Engineering, Social & Historical Sciences, and Arts & Humanities. Find out more: https://ucl.ac.uk/urbanlab
The Bartlett, UCL
22 Gordon Street
London WC1H 0QB
Keep up with all Bartlett 100 stories and events.
Be the first to hear about upcoming events and stories from across The Bartlett.Sign me up!